Biplane’s landing goes awry

Increase font  Decrease font Release Date:2016-09-08  Source:GENERAL AVIATION NEWS  Author:Jessica  Views:1092
Tips:The owner/builder of the experimental amateur-built, tailwheel-equipped Lionheart biplane was seated in the front left seat, with another pilot seated in the right seat, and a passenger in the rear seat.

The owner/builder of the experimental amateur-built, tailwheel-equipped Lionheart biplane was seated in the front left seat, with another pilot seated in the right seat, and a passenger in the rear seat.


The intent of the flight was to prepare both pilots for a flight review, with both trading off flight duties as necessary. They planned to initially perform touch-and-go landings at their home base airport, with the pilot in the right seat acting as pilot-in-command.


The first takeoff and landing was uneventful, but the airport was busy, so they diverted to the airport in Santa Maria, Calif., to practice further.


The landing approach was normal, with the airplane touching down slightly to the right of centerline and then bouncing. The pilot made corrective control inputs, but the plane did not fully respond, bouncing again on the runway.


He applied forward elevator pressure and the airplane landed a third time, this time remaining on the ground.


The airplane began to drift to the right, but would not respond to the pilot’s rudder inputs. The owner/builder then applied left rudder, but the airplane continued to drift towards a runway sign.


As they passed to the right of the sign the airplane pitched down violently, and nosed over.


The airplane sustained substantial damage to the left upper wing and the vertical stabilizer.


The owner stated that this was the first flight since he had completed the airplane’s conditional inspection, and no flight control malfunctions were discovered at that time.


He subsequently stated that he did not find any mechanical malfunctions or failures during a post-accident examination.


He further surmised that the design of the braking system was such that simultaneous application of the left and right side brake pedals by both pilots may have resulted in excessive brake pressure, and this may have been the reason the airplane nosed over so unexpectedly.


The NTSB determined the probable cause as the pilot’s inadequate landing flare and subsequent loss of directional control during the landing roll.


NTSB Identification: WPR14CA365


This September 2014 accident report is provided by the National Transportation Safety Board. Published as an educational tool, it is intended to help pilots learn from the misfortunes of others.

 
Keywords: biplane, flight review
 

 
0 reviews [ See all reviews ]  Customer Reviews

 
Recommended Articles And Photos
Recommend News & Info
Click Ranking
 
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Intellectual Property | Copyright & Trademark | Legal Disclaimer | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Sitemap | Promotion | Ads Service | Web MSG